Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Uma v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Uma v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hanno v. Emsdeich and Dam Katta v. d. Schmiede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Katta v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich50.00011
    Nixe v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide25.00011
    Debby v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal12.50011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch12.50011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund9.370211
    Lukas v. Linduri9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Henk v. Huntetal6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Dolly Nelha6.25011
    Mira v. Linduri6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Nimrods Enno6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Maika v. Wiken6.25011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Baron v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s