Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Quitte v. Alten Hafen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Quitte v. Alten Hafen
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire D'Emil v. Eulenspiegel and Dam Lotta v. Alten Hafen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Lotta v. Alten Hafen50.00011
    D'Emil v. Eulenspiegel50.00011
    Anja v. Veybach25.00011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Basko v. Tannengarten25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Milla v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Jule v. Linduri12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Pascha v. Elbufer6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Eiko v. Weithof3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Vella v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s