Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anteck vu'n Tegelland
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anteck vu'n Tegelland
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Sepp Aus Grupilinga and Dam Eica v. Rottenanger
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Eica v. Rottenanger50.00011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Antje aus Apelstedt25.00011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch25.00011
    Bathys v. Heidmoor25.00011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Xena v. Huntetal12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Rike v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Nostra De Wynen12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Valeska v. Huntetal6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Mirko v. Jurawald6.25011
    Gilla De Wynen6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Anuschka v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Erlo De Wynen6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Vicky v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Immo De Wynen3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s