Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Arko v. Heisterchecken
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Arko v. Heisterchecken
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ando v. Hollbäck and Dam Uria v. d. Hafkesdell
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 4.297%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ando v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Uria v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Queen v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Aska v. Forstkamp25.00011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Birte v. Burbachtal12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50022
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri9.370211
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Acra v. d. Pielmey6.25011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.24022
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.24022
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.24022
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Belle v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s