Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Brecken v. Wispering Winds
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Brecken v. Wispering Winds
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Garry v. Frochtmannshof and Dam Alpenjaegers Axa
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Alpenjaegers Axa50.00011
    Garry v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Alf v. Illertal25.00011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Dixi v. Illertal25.00011
    Anton v. Hasselrath12.50011
    Lady v. Hülsebusch12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Dina v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50022
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Birko v. Moorhof6.25011
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Breeze v. Stockey6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Aaron Van't Watermoor6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Centa v. Hülsebusch6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Hektor v. Geierling3.12011
    Cora v. Herrenmoor3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Fee v. Elbufer3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Arras v. Autal3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s