Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Figo v. Wolfbösch
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Figo v. Wolfbösch
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hermes v. Buchheim and Dam Westfalen's Cora
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.418%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Westfalen's Cora50.00011
    Hermes v. Buchheim50.00011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund25.00011
    Unken v. Buchheim25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz25.00011
    Nixe v. Buchheim12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Dana v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Heido v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Bonny v. Erdinger Moos12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Bella v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Gitta v. Buchheim6.25011
    Bella v. Muggental6.25011
    Lord v. Jurawald6.25011
    Andra v. Buchheim6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Fara v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Basco v. Gressenback3.12011
    Ara v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s