Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Victoria v. Stockey
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Victoria v. Stockey
    COI 5 gen: 3.906%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Chef v. Seulingswald and Dam Roberta v. Stockey
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)65
    Ancestor Loss-3
    Ancestor Loss in %104.84 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Chef v. Seulingswald50.00011
    Flocke v. Wasserplatz50.00011
    Roberta v. Stockey50.00011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Ibse v. Linebrok25.00011
    Evita v. Stockey25.00022
    Naomi v. Stockey25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Gauner v. Stockey25.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Jerome De Wynen15.620211
    Asco Westerode12.50022
    Elfe v. Linebrok12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Alex v. Bannwald12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell12.50022
    Herman v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Solojäger's Harras9.370211
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Nadja De Wynen6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Niklas De Wynen6.25011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Dina Chamavia6.24022
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle6.24022
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.24022
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.24022
    Jenny De Wynen6.24022
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Amber De Wynen3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s