Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anka v. Ohmsteder Holz
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anka v. Ohmsteder Holz
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Sepp Aus Grupilinga and Dam Judy v. d. Horstbüschen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.293%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)69
    Ancestor Loss-7
    Ancestor Loss in %111.29 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bautz v. d. Leda56.240312
    Amsel v. Silbergrund53.120211
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Judy v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch25.00011
    Derry v. Erlesberg25.00011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch25.00011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer18.750211
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg12.50011
    Moni v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal12.50011
    Nostra De Wynen12.50011
    Locke Frankundfrei12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Anke v. Keenmoor9.370211
    Hakon v. Forstgarten9.370211
    Henk v. Huntetal6.25011
    Maika v. Wiken6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Cindy v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen6.25011
    Cilli v. Grünen Wege6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Ira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Gero Frankundfrei6.25011
    Gilla De Wynen6.25011
    Halla v. Linduri6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Erlo De Wynen6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.24022
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Achill v. Jagello3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Cura v. Waldesgryn3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Anka v. Jagenberg3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Cassan v. Lindenbauer3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cora v. Lindenbauer3.12011
    Immo De Wynen3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s