Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Daika v. Kiekenbruch
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Daika v. Kiekenbruch
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bathys v. Heidmoor and Dam Birka v. Kiekenbruch
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Birka v. Kiekenbruch50.00011
    Bathys v. Heidmoor50.00011
    Westfalen's Cäsar25.00011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe25.00011
    Rike v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Anuschka v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg12.50011
    Mirko v. Jurawald12.50011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s