Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ciara v. Lohmühlweiher
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ciara v. Lohmühlweiher
    COI 5 gen: 2.051%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Henry v. Fränkischen Bauern and Dam Ilka v. d. Riedleite
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.246%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ilka v. d. Riedleite50.00011
    Henry v. Fränkischen Bauern50.00011
    Harras v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Erle v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Farah v. Kappelbuck25.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno25.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz15.620211
    Quelle v. Buchheim12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Cilly v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof9.370211
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Aiko v. Aischtal6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Conny v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Britta v. Distelberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s