Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Alba v. Eschdorf
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Alba v. Eschdorf
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gero v. Reitbach and Dam Holly v. Fränkischen Bauern
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.246%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Holly v. Fränkischen Bauern50.00011
    Gero v. Reitbach50.00011
    Erle v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Rika v. Linduri25.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda18.750211
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Cilly v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.490312
    Gitta v. Lossetal9.370211
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s