Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Basko v. Blanken-Diek
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Basko v. Blanken-Diek
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Zar v. Linduri and Dam Cleo v. d. Meesenburg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Zar v. Linduri50.00011
    Cleo v. d. Meesenburg50.00011
    Gerry v. Paradies25.00011
    Ganna v. Hasenkamp25.00011
    Dunja v. Reitbach25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Dele v. Paradies12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Finja v. Hasenkamp12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof9.370211
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Annett v. Paradies6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Bessy v. Hasenkamp6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Assi Chamavia3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Dachs v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s