Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aaron v. Porrenberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aaron v. Porrenberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ben v. Diekstücken and Dam Akra v. Heidmoor
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Akra v. Heidmoor50.00011
    Ben v. Diekstücken50.00011
    Arras v. Eikenloh25.00011
    Rike v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Athena v. Hasselrath25.00011
    Aaron Van't Watermoor12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Lucie Nelha12.50011
    Mirko v. Jurawald12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Anuschka v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Breeze v. Stockey12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hektor v. Geierling6.25011
    Cora v. Herrenmoor6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Arras v. Autal6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.24022
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Jonas Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund3.12011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Jule v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Dirk v. Geierling3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Gina Ut Dat Uhlendörp3.12011
    Groll v. Elbufer3.12011
    Ester v. Geierling3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s