Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ura v. Stockey
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ura v. Stockey
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dago v. Heek and Dam Roberta v. Stockey
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dago v. Heek50.00011
    Roberta v. Stockey50.00011
    Asta v. Averbeck25.00011
    Hardy v. Paradies25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Naomi v. Stockey25.00011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Dele v. Paradies12.50011
    Isko v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Herman v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Evita v. Stockey12.50011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Annett v. Paradies6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Asco Westerode6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s