Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ovana v. Alten Hafen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ovana v. Alten Hafen
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bismarck v. Kreidesee and Dam Celly v. Veybach
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.488%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Celly v. Veybach50.00011
    Bismarck v. Kreidesee50.00011
    Asterix v. Veybach25.00011
    Karlotta-Isa v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Amrai v. Forstkamp25.00011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch25.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer15.620211
    Milla v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Auguste v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer12.50011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Nostra De Wynen12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Uri v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Erlo De Wynen6.25011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Gilla De Wynen6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Pascha v. Elbufer6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Immo De Wynen3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s