Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gerry v. Waldberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gerry v. Waldberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Coach v. Ziegelweiher and Dam Ronja Nelha
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher50.00011
    Ronja Nelha50.00011
    Westfalen's Birka25.00011
    Jola Nelha25.00011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Dax Nelha12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Nimrod's Birko9.370211
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Birke Nelha6.25011
    Quacks v. Lossetal6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.24022
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nixe v. Lossetal3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s