Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Emma v. Fürstenwald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Emma v. Fürstenwald
    COI 5 gen: 3.516%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Alex v. Murner See and Dam Bessi v. Ohetal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)77
    Ancestor Loss-15
    Ancestor Loss in %124.19 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bessi v. Ohetal50.00011
    Alex v. Murner See50.00011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau25.00011
    Grandl De Wynen25.00011
    Birke v. Stammberg25.00011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg25.00011
    Mando De Wynen18.750211
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Alice v. Wiebusch12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Bonni v. Lundberg12.50011
    Xanthippe De Wynen12.50011
    Anka v. Schönrain12.50011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Joe De Wynen9.370211
    Gilla De Wynen9.370211
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Iska v. Werneck6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Orion De Wynen6.25011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Jula Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Pascal De Wynen6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.24022
    Cent v. Hofried6.24022
    Nimrod's Birko6.24022
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011
    Boro v. Silbersee3.12011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cora v. Werneck3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Colt v. Loisachtal3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s