Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cleo v. Hirschberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cleo v. Hirschberg
    COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Henry v. Fränkischen Bauern and Dam Bella v. Herrenweg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.246%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Henry v. Fränkischen Bauern50.00011
    Bella v. Herrenweg50.00011
    Warus v. Linduri25.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno25.00011
    Ilka v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Erle v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50022
    Ivo v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Gitte v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Aaron v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Elkan v. Linebrok12.50011
    Senta v. Linduri12.50011
    Cilly v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee9.36033
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Bonny v. Brückhof6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Corda v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s