Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bente v. Schloss Clemenswerth
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bente v. Schloss Clemenswerth
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hektor v. Emsdeich and Dam Cassy v. Hesterwede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hektor v. Emsdeich50.00011
    Cassy v. Hesterwede50.00011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide31.250211
    Hanno v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Bessy v. Loher Schwarten25.00011
    Dina Chamavia25.00022
    Kora v. Königsfeld25.00011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Debby v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp15.620321
    Olga v. Bärenhorst15.620211
    Cliff v. Linduri15.620211
    Arko v. Abtswald12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal12.50011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz12.50022
    Uta Chamavia12.50022
    Astor v. d. Weide12.50011
    Henry v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Gera v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Lona v. Linduri12.50011
    Alf v. Siegbogen12.50011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant9.370211
    Asta v. Bartelskamp9.370211
    Drossel v. d. Grassel9.370211
    Bussa v. Saaletal6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Thanhausen's Abke6.25011
    Harro v. Lossetal6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Josi v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Dolly Nelha6.25011
    Afra v. Seggehorn6.25011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode6.25011
    Blitz v. Weithof6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Nimrods Enno6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Baron v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s