Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Baja. v. d. Nolingse
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Baja. v. d. Nolingse
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Wenzel v. Elbufer and Dam Chica v. d. vier Toren
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Wenzel v. Elbufer50.00011
    Chica v. d. vier Toren50.00011
    Athena v. d. Vier Toren25.00011
    Maja Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Eike v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Hermann v. Stellfelde25.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50022
    Effi v. Stellfelde12.50011
    Brutus v. Stockey12.50011
    Pascha v. Elbufer12.50011
    Aqua v. Schrubberdörp12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Enzo v. Linebrok12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Aika v. Cellerland6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Maja v. Elbufer6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Krischka v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Hektor v. Geierling6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Ronja v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Gusti v. Giesenbusch3.12011
    Jade v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Ester v. Geierling3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Ilko v. Niddatal3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Dirk v. Geierling3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s