Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anton v. d. Insel Fanoe
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anton v. d. Insel Fanoe
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lucky v. Heesenhof and Dam Pizi v. Forst Ostenwalde
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.930%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Pizi v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Lucky v. Heesenhof50.00011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein25.00011
    Askan v. Iberg25.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno25.00011
    Lissi v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Gero v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Xenia v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Rena v. Elbufer12.50011
    Inga v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Ajax v. Eschbach12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz9.370211
    Lukas v. Linduri9.370211
    Laura v. Poppenforst9.370211
    Carlo v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Cita v. Hollbäck6.25011
    Maja v. Elbufer6.25011
    Otti v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Pom v. Minatal3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Aska v. Forstkamp3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher3.12011
    Aischa v. Heek3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s