Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Quinte v. Schlemminer Forst
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Quinte v. Schlemminer Forst
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Xudo Nelha and Dam Galli Il v. Schlemminer Forst
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.465%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.051%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Xudo Nelha50.00011
    Galli Il v. Schlemminer Forst50.00011
    Rauke Nelha25.00011
    Anjuscha v. Schlemminer Forst25.00011
    Elkan v. Linebrok25.00011
    Westfalen's Cäsar25.00011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Zuska v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Jola Nelha12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.490312
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf6.25011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.25011
    Xorro De Wynen6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Cora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Uska v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Quecke v. Haberland3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s