Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Barco v. Kirchenweiher
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Barco v. Kirchenweiher
    COI 5 gen: 3.711%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Vyko v. Sämmenhof and Dam Forelle v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.051%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)73
    Ancestor Loss-11
    Ancestor Loss in %117.74 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Falco v. Averbeck50.00011
    Vyko v. Sämmenhof50.00011
    Erle v. d. Vechtequelle50.00011
    Forelle v. Buchheim50.00011
    Unken v. Buchheim25.00011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Danny v. Averbeck25.00011
    Dina v. Kemmberg25.00011
    Crash v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Westfalen's Anton25.00011
    Racker v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Bea v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei25.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz18.750211
    Gauner v. Stockey18.750211
    Heido v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Gesche v. Burghöft12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Artos v. Wollbachsgraben12.50011
    Nixe v. Buchheim12.50011
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Queen v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Andra v. Buchheim6.25011
    Ojah v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Kora v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Bonny v. d. Wolkenbrust6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Jasmin v. Buchheim6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cato Saerbeck3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s