Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Don v. Blanken-Diek
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Don v. Blanken-Diek
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dolf v. Linduri and Dam Alfa v. Blanken-Diek
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dolf v. Linduri50.00011
    Alfa v. Blanken-Diek50.00011
    Ben v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Dunja v. Reitbach25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Cleo v. d. Meesenburg25.00011
    Westfalen's Cäsar12.50011
    Ganna v. Hasenkamp12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Gerry v. Paradies12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Finja v. Hasenkamp6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.24022
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Bessy v. Hasenkamp3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s