Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bruno v. Kiebitzmoor
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bruno v. Kiebitzmoor
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Jesko v. Heek and Dam Birka v. Kiekenbruch
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Jesko v. Heek50.00011
    Birka v. Kiekenbruch50.00011
    Westfalen's Cäsar25.00011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe25.00011
    Hardy v. Paradies25.00011
    Cora v. Heek25.00011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Isko v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg12.50011
    Dele v. Paradies12.50011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Annett v. Paradies6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s