Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Satan ll v. Schlemminer Forst
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Satan ll v. Schlemminer Forst
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Egon v. Buchheim and Dam Luna v. Schlemminer Forst
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Egon v. Buchheim50.00011
    Luna v. Schlemminer Forst50.00011
    Alex v. Murner See25.00011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Galli Il v. Schlemminer Forst25.00011
    Elkan v. Linebrok12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Grandl De Wynen12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Lilli v. Buchheim12.50011
    Anjuscha v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald9.370211
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Xanthippe De Wynen6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese6.25011
    Zuska v. Schlemminer Forst6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Xorro De Wynen3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Andra v. Buchheim3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Mando De Wynen3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Iska v. Werneck3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s