Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Alf v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Alf v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Fritz v. Kiekenbruch and Dam Katta v. d. Schmiede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Katta v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Fritz v. Kiekenbruch50.00011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide25.00011
    Clara v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Nixe v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Solojäger's Unkas25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Solojäger's Maraun12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch12.50011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Mira v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Jola Nelha6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.24022
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s