Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cliff Nelha
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cliff Nelha
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ingo v. Averbeck and Dam Birke ll Nelha
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)67
    Ancestor Loss-5
    Ancestor Loss in %108.06 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Vyko v. Sämmenhof50.00011
    Ingo v. Averbeck50.00011
    Dina v. Holdergrund50.00011
    Birke ll Nelha50.00011
    Hermes v. Buchheim25.00011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal25.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Angi v. Weiherhof25.00011
    Danny v. Averbeck25.00011
    Racker v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Bea v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei25.00011
    Tilia Nelha25.00011
    Heido v. Lönsstein18.750211
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Unken v. Buchheim12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Solojäger's Mélac12.50011
    Orkan v. Linebrok12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Gera v. Kirschenberg12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Aloe v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei12.50011
    Tuja v. Lossetal12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund12.50011
    Queen v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Gera v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Jasmin v. Buchheim6.25011
    Perle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Halla v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bonny v. Erdinger Moos6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald6.25011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Jola Nelha6.25011
    Nixe v. Buchheim6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Perro Nelha6.25011
    Lara v. Linebrok6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.24022
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.24022
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s