Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Diva v. Auerbach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Diva v. Auerbach
    COI 5 gen: 5.078%    low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ivo v. Reitbach and Dam Dina v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)63
    Ancestor Loss-1
    Ancestor Loss in %101.61 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dina v. Linduri50.00011
    Ivo v. Reitbach50.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling31.250211
    Rika v. Linduri28.120321
    Westfalen's Cuno25.00011
    Gora v. Reitbach25.00011
    Ben v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein25.00011
    Dunja v. Reitbach25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga18.750211
    Kira v. Tillplatz18.750211
    Arras v. Eikenloh18.750211
    Arras v. Eschbach15.620211
    Lukas v. Linduri15.620321
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50022
    Westfalen's Cäsar12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50022
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Rena v. Elbufer12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer9.370211
    Lucie Nelha9.370211
    Solojäger's Laura9.370211
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde9.370211
    Dana v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee9.36033
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Cita v. Hollbäck6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Maja v. Elbufer6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.24022
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.24022
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.24022
    Hesta v. Linduri6.24022
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Aischa v. Heek3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller3.12011
    Aska v. Forstkamp3.12011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald3.12011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s