Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Jade v. Illertal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Jade v. Illertal
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Nando v. Auwelt and Dam Rüdemann's Anka
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.734%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Nando v. Auwelt50.00011
    Rüdemann's Anka50.00011
    Imme v. Auwelt25.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Preußen's Hesta25.00011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Esta v. Auwelt12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Osy v. Wiken12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz9.370211
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Brutus v. Stockey6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Asta Westerode6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor6.25011
    Aaron v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.24022
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.24022
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.24022
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Lord v. Hofried3.12011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle3.12011
    Bonny v. Brückhof3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Hektor v. Geierling3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s