Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Elly v. Kratholt
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Elly v. Kratholt
    COI 5 gen: 0.684%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arko v. d. Kröchereiche and Dam Dolly v. Kratholt
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dolly v. Kratholt50.00011
    Arko v. d. Kröchereiche50.00011
    Betty v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Alexa v.d. Reutereiche25.00011
    Endo v. Heek25.00011
    Illo v. d. Trave25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Happy v. d. Trave12.50011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Ira v. Stockey12.50011
    Hasko v. Linebrok12.50011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Elfe v. Linebrok9.370211
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Gusti v. Stockey6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Cessy v. d. Trave6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Herman v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Dina v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Jenka Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s