Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gelja v. Schlichthorst
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gelja v. Schlichthorst
    COI 5 gen: 3.320%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hanno v. Alt-Hümmling and Dam Yndra v. Lönsstein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ojah v. d. Drachheide50.00011
    Yndra v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Hanno v. Alt-Hümmling50.00011
    Mirco v. Linduri50.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga37.4904112
    Cita v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Hardy v. Heek25.00011
    Elsa v. Burghöft25.00011
    Vera ll v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Asta v. Averbeck18.750211
    Nimrod's Birko12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Basko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Otti v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Aischa v. Heek12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.490312
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.490312
    Hesta v. Linduri9.370211
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Larry v. Ringofen6.25011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Quell v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Chica v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s