Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ondra Gettrup
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ondra Gettrup
    COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arco v. d. Berkelaue and Dam Anna vun de Moorkoppel
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)55
    Ancestor Loss7
    Ancestor Loss in %88.71 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Arco v. d. Berkelaue50.00011
    Anna vun de Moorkoppel50.00011
    Wilco v. Huntetal25.00011
    Eyka v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Isabell v. Buchheim25.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Quendy v. Huntetal12.50011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Olga v. d. Drachheide9.370211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.36033
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Laika v. Linduri6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Pom v. Minatal6.25011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Henk v. Huntetal6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Maika v. Wiken6.25011
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.24022
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.24022
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Nora v. Minatal3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s