Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anna vun de Moorkoppel
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anna vun de Moorkoppel
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Wilco v. Huntetal and Dam Eyka v. d. Segeberger Heide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Wilco v. Huntetal50.00011
    Eyka v. d. Segeberger Heide50.00011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege25.00011
    Quendy v. Huntetal25.00011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Maika v. Wiken12.50011
    Henk v. Huntetal12.50011
    Pom v. Minatal12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Gera v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50022
    Laika v. Linduri12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.24022
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.24022
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Lord v. Hofried3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Katja v. Minatal3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s