Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aaron v. Märchental
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aaron v. Märchental
    COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe and Dam Heidehexe v. Veybach
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Heidehexe v. Veybach50.00011
    Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Ivo v. Buchheim25.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund25.00011
    Karlotta-Isa v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga18.750211
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Akim v. Rothsee12.50011
    Auguste v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura9.370211
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde9.370211
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Foko v. Erlengrund6.25011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Mona v. Linduri3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s