Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Otti v. Alt-Hümmling
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Otti v. Alt-Hümmling
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gonzo v. Adewacht and Dam Merle v. Alt-Hümmling
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.051%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)72
    Ancestor Loss-10
    Ancestor Loss in %116.13 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Merle v. Alt-Hümmling50.00011
    Butcher v. Dinkelstrand50.00011
    Billa v. Heideberg50.00011
    Gonzo v. Adewacht50.00011
    Cita v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Ivo v. Reitbach25.00011
    Alfa v. Heideberg25.00011
    Freya v. Adewacht25.00011
    Elvis v. Horum25.00011
    Helgo v. Einen25.00011
    Fingal Würtsen25.00011
    Cerry aus der Mussinger Heide25.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Detje v. Adewacht12.50011
    Sentala v. Muritzstrand12.50011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Wilco v. Huntetal12.50011
    Gora v. Reitbach12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Bea v. Calveslage12.50011
    Chic v. Bärenstein12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.36033
    Hindu Cammin6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Allah-Plavia6.25011
    Nova Rehden6.25011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Este v. Linebrok6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Tell v. Fischerhof6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Quendy v. Huntetal6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Amor v. Butendieks3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Tell Hehlen Linden3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Flora Hehlen Linden3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Ambra v. Struthof3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s