Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anna v. d. Kettles
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anna v. d. Kettles
    COI 5 gen: 0.830%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bear v. Coraschatten and Dam Peggy v. d. Horstbüschen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Peggy v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Bear v. Coraschatten50.00011
    Ando v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Neele v.d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Cora v. Illertal25.00011
    Arco v. Hautzerfeld25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga15.620211
    Anton v. Hasselrath12.50011
    Lexis v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Lucky v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Dina v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Breeze v. Stockey6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Aaron Van't Watermoor6.25011
    Preußen's Blitz6.25011
    Anka v. Rothsee6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Aikfried v. Murner See6.25011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Hektor v. Geierling3.12011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Arras v. Autal3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Greif v. Reitbach3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Grandl De Wynen3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Cora v. Herrenmoor3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Inka v. Rehhörn3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s