Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Figaro v. d. Frankenhöhe
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Figaro v. d. Frankenhöhe
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Regent v. Buchheim and Dam Adelheid v. d. Frankenhöhe
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Regent v. Buchheim50.00011
    Adelheid v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Jazz v. Buchheim25.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund25.00011
    Schorsch v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef18.750211
    Jessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim12.50011
    Etzel v. Buchheim12.50011
    Akim v. Rothsee12.50011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Boss v. Mellin12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Osca Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Katteneck's Daisy6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Nesta v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Foko v. Erlengrund6.25011
    Ondra v. Stockey6.25011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Mona v. Linduri3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Brack v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Aenne v. Stockey3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s