Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Neandertal's Elmo
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Neandertal's Elmo
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Crash v. Ziegelweiher and Dam Montana v. Heesenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Crash v. Ziegelweiher50.00011
    Montana v. Heesenhof50.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Anton v. Kirchhof25.00011
    Westfalen's Birka25.00011
    Bella v. d. Röttenkath25.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz15.620211
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Karlo v. d. Jade12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Bonny v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Aikfried v. Murner See12.50011
    Kaja v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Antje v. Horum6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Gero v. Reitbach6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Bea v. Calveslage3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Cody v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s