Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Nick v. Heesenhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Nick v. Heesenhof
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Anton v. Kirchhof and Dam Bella v. d. Röttenkath
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anton v. Kirchhof50.00011
    Bella v. d. Röttenkath50.00011
    Aikfried v. Murner See25.00011
    Bonny v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Kaja v. Heesenhof25.00011
    Karlo v. d. Jade25.00011
    Hasko v. Linebrok15.620211
    Westfalen's Cuno12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Gero v. Reitbach12.50011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein12.50011
    Grandl De Wynen12.50011
    Antje v. Horum12.50011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Cody v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Bea v. Calveslage6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Xanthippe De Wynen6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Rena v. Elbufer6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Mando De Wynen3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Iska v. Werneck3.12011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s