Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bezzi v. Steigerwald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bezzi v. Steigerwald
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arko v. Zaunmoos and Dam Witti v. d. Schmiede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Witti v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Arko v. Zaunmoos50.00011
    Nestor v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Daisy v. Schönrain25.00011
    Xena v. Linduri25.00011
    Vyko v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Racker v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Ivan v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Bea v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei12.50011
    Senta v. Linduri12.50011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Bessy v. Schönrain12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Aury v. Waidbosch9.370211
    Gera v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Laura v. Poppenforst9.370211
    Hesta v. Linduri9.370211
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Aloe v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei6.25011
    Blitz v. Rottenanger6.25011
    Heido v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Queen v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Dag v. Betzloh6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Freia v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Esta v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Assi v. Hegholz3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Chris v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Jasmin v. Buchheim3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Lilli v. Buchheim3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Aspe v. Betzloh3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s