Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Lio v. Eulenspiegel
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Lio v. Eulenspiegel
    COI 5 gen: 3.906%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Jaro v. Veybach and Dam Maite v. d. Riede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)68
    Ancestor Loss-6
    Ancestor Loss in %109.68 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde53.120211
    Solojäger's Lotte50.00011
    Jaro v. Veybach50.00011
    Maite v. d. Riede50.00011
    Kondy v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff25.00011
    Grace v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Max v. d. Riedleite25.00011
    Solojäger's Harras25.00011
    Izzy v. Buchheim25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00022
    Bautz v. d. Leda18.740312
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50022
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50022
    Farah v. Kappelbuck12.50011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck9.370211
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Quelle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg6.25011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Moni v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.24022
    Gina v. Roonstein6.24022
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.24022
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.24022
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Halla v. Linduri3.12011
    Ira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Aiko v. Aischtal3.12011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s