Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Janko v. Fliethbachthal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Janko v. Fliethbachthal
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Jesko v. Heek and Dam Fee v. Fliethbachtal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.074%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)69
    Ancestor Loss-7
    Ancestor Loss in %111.29 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Clio De Wynen50.00011
    Elz v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Fee v. Fliethbachtal50.00011
    Jesko v. Heek50.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Dascha v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
    Hardy v. Paradies25.00011
    Xanthippe De Wynen25.00011
    Cora v. Heek25.00011
    Basko v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung25.00011
    Enzo v. Linebrok25.00011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp15.620211
    Bautz v. d. Leda15.620211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land15.620211
    Igor v. Linebrok12.50022
    Euro v. Blumenhof12.50011
    Karlo v. Linebrok12.50011
    Aischa v. Heek12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50022
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund12.50011
    Benja v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Orion De Wynen12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Pascal De Wynen12.50011
    Arko v. Kammerforst6.25011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Bryka v.d.Röthaller6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Artemis v. d. Wandelburg6.25011
    Cora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Perro Nelha6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.25011
    Jolly De Wynen6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Bonny v. Brückhof6.25011
    Gora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Colt v. Loisachtal6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.24022
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.24022
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.24022
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Corda v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s