Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Eike v. Coraschatten
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Eike v. Coraschatten
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Theodor v. d. Hafkesdell and Dam Autrey v. Coraschatten
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Theodor v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Autrey v. Coraschatten50.00011
    Cora v. Illertal25.00011
    Nando v. Auwelt25.00011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Anton v. Hasselrath12.50011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Lexis v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Imme v. Auwelt12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Breeze v. Stockey6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Aaron Van't Watermoor6.25011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Esta v. Auwelt6.25011
    Preußen's Blitz6.25011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Cora v. Herrenmoor3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Arras v. Autal3.12011
    Inka v. Rehhörn3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Brutus v. Stockey3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Asta Westerode3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Hektor v. Geierling3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s