Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Eddy Westerode
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Eddy Westerode
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Smirre v. Buchheim and Dam Asta v. Grinkensquell
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.074%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Smirre v. Buchheim50.00011
    Asta v. Grinkensquell50.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Meila v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim12.50011
    Inga v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese12.50011
    Anja v. Veybach12.50011
    Basko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Jockel v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Fina v. Neuenkämpen12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern9.370211
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Dina v. Neuenkämpen6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Galli Il v. Schlemminer Forst6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Alex v. Murner See6.25011
    Milla v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.24022
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Grandl De Wynen3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Anjuscha v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Pom v. Minatal3.12011
    Anka v. Raddetal3.12011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Elkan v. Linebrok3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Hasko v. Linebrok3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s