Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Marlene v. Reitbach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Marlene v. Reitbach
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hanno v. Alt-Hümmling and Dam Jane v. Reitbach
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hanno v. Alt-Hümmling50.00011
    Jane v. Reitbach50.00011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Cita v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Gora v. Reitbach25.00011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Aischa v. Heek12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.490312
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Nostra De Wynen6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.24022
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.24022
    Erlo De Wynen3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Gilla De Wynen3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s