Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Inga v. Wietensholt
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Inga v. Wietensholt
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Westfalen's Don and Dam Hummel v. Wietensholt
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Westfalen's Don50.00011
    Hummel v. Wietensholt50.00011
    Hardy v. Heek25.00011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal25.00011
    Lena v. Heesenhof25.00011
    Fanny v. Wietensholt25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach18.750211
    Delta v. Lockfehn12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Anka v. Rothsee12.50011
    Westfalen's Cuno12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri9.370211
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Rena v. Elbufer6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Amsel v. Hahnentange6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Akko v. Loher Schwarten6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.24022
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.24022
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Henry v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Lona v. Linduri3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Orka v. Linduri3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s