Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dago v. Kapellenweg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dago v. Kapellenweg
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Falco v. Averbeck and Dam Erle v. d. Vechtequelle
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.148%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Falco v. Averbeck50.00011
    Erle v. d. Vechtequelle50.00011
    Dina v. Kemmberg25.00011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Crash v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Danny v. Averbeck25.00011
    Artos v. Wollbachsgraben12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Gesche v. Burghöft12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.36033
    Bonny v. d. Wolkenbrust6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Ojah v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.24022
    Iska v. Niddatal3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Ingo v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s