Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Didi v. Laon
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Didi v. Laon
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dark v. d. Vorheide and Dam Gitta v. Frochtmannshof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gitta v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Dark v. d. Vorheide50.00011
    Illo v. d. Trave25.00011
    Walburga v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte12.50022
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Happy v. d. Trave12.50011
    Tessa v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Birko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Cessy v. d. Trave6.25011
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte6.24022
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Jenka Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s