Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Janna v. Horum
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Janna v. Horum
    COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Pixel v. Kreyenhorst and Dam Kenna v. d. Jade
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Kenna v. d. Jade50.00011
    Elvis v. Horum50.00011
    Hummel v. Wietensholt50.00011
    Pixel v. Kreyenhorst50.00011
    Gero v. Reitbach25.00011
    Antje v. Horum25.00011
    Fanny v. Wietensholt25.00011
    Bonny v. Alten Forsthaus25.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach18.750211
    Rika v. Linduri18.750211
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Cody v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Bea v. Calveslage12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Winde Nelha12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein9.370211
    Amsel v. Silbergrund9.370211
    Arras v. Eikenloh9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Tilia Nelha6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Solojäger's Mélac3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Ambra v. Struthof3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Amor v. Butendieks3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Tuja v. Lossetal3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s